/
Difference between FMB920 and MTB100

Difference between FMB920 and MTB100

Size:

FMB920: 79 x 43 x 12 mm (L x W x H) / 54g weight

MTB100: 79 x 43 x 27.5 mm (L x W x H) / 69g weight

MTB100 - 1 LED status indication

FMB920 - 2 LEDs indicating device status

 

Current Consumption at 12V MTB100:

GPRS: average 63.48 mA rms

Nominal: average 24.40 rms

GNSS sleep: average 4.78 mA

Deep Sleep: average 3.65 mA

Online Deep Sleep: average 4.10 mA

Ultra Deep Sleep: average 2.56 mA

Rated current: 250 mA

 

Current Consumption at 12V FMB920:

GPRS: average 63.48 mA rms

Nominal: average 24.40 rms

GNSS sleep: average 5.58 mA

Deep Sleep: average 4.06 mA

Online Deep Sleep: average 4.62 mA

Ultra Deep Sleep: average 2.08 mA

Rated current: 250 mA

 

MTB100 Operating Temperature (without battery): -25..+55 °C

FMB920 Operating Temperature (without battery): -40..+85 °C

Devices functionalities are the same.

Related content

comparison between FMB920 vs MTB100
comparison between FMB920 vs MTB100
More like this
Difference between FMU/FMM/FMC/FMB
Difference between FMU/FMM/FMC/FMB
More like this
FM6xxx vs FMB6xx
FM6xxx vs FMB6xx
More like this
FMB120 vs FMB130
FMB120 vs FMB130
More like this
MTB100
More like this
FM3612 vs FM6300
FM3612 vs FM6300
More like this